| It is rewarding to see the recognition being given to the work of Daniel Goleman on emotional intelligence and Howard Gardner on multiple intelligence. Their work continues the progress from many years of bringing affective education into the classroom.
The modern movement to recognize the importance of affective education (to complement the more traditionally oriented cognitive - logical, analytical, information oriented emphasis in education) perhaps began with Abraham Maslows studies of peak experiences in the 1950s. Instead of focusing on problems, Maslow focused on health and well being. For the first time we were given insights into what well, successful and happy people seem to be doing right. Before Maslow most research efforts were concerned with diagnosing illness or failure.
Carl Rogers client-centered methods and his book Freedom to Learn (1969), showed us the importance of feelings, concerns and asked us to put the learner (or client) in focus, not the teacher or psychologist.
Until the beginning of the 1970s, however, there were no particular school curriculums designed to enhance self-concepts, social or emotional growth. The University of Massachusetts School of Education became, in the early 1970s, a center for humanistic-affective education. Methods for self-concept development, values clarification and conflict resolution were developed.
Humanistically based psychotherapy, for example Gestalt Therapy, became more widely known. George Brown at the University of California in Santa Barbara was a pioneer in the concept called confluent education in which he made the claim that affective and cognitive growth go hand in hand.
The 1970s also saw the growth of a new model in psychology called NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming). John Grinder and Richard Bandler at The University of California at Santa Cruz, developed models for recognizing more clearly individual learning styles and strategies. Kenneth and Rita Dunns work with individual learning styles also became more widely known.
Yet another concept from the 1970s was the moral education movement, spearheaded by Lawrence Kohlberg from Harvard University. Kohlbergs research indicated that there were different levels of moral behavior, much in the same way that Jean Piaget proposed different levels for cognitive or intellectual development, from concrete reasoning to abstract reasoning.
Today one speaks also of character training, perhaps spurred on by a more politically conservative perspective than the previous psychological models. It is interesting because religious and politically conservative groups were very much against schools taking initiatives to teach values and morals. It is the realm of the home and the church. There is renewed belief that the schools can also play an important role in ethic and character development.
What was happening? The old model was to see all students as having to meet a certain standardized norm of intelligence. Now a new model or paradigm was developing. This new way of thinking was to see the individual as unique. Each child and adult learns differently and has different needs and strategies for learning. Suddenly, the tables were turned. Instead of the student always having to adjust to the teachers way of teaching, the teacher was being asked to recognize that children learn differently. In other words, if a child doesnt learn it could just as well be a teaching problem instead of a child problem.
Humanistic or affective education means that we see the whole child. The research on leftbrain and rightbrain orientation confirms the importance of this. A whole new discipline is developing we may call Brain Pedagogics. People like Eric Jensen, Georgi Lozanov (Suggestopedia) and others are demonstrating teaching methods which speak to both the left and right sides of the brain.
Howard Gardners model for seven types of intelligence points out what weve all suspected: people can be smart in different ways. Daniel Golemans efforts on behalf of emotional intelligence point out how nuances in social and emotional skills can lead to satisfying and successful lives.
It is satisfying to see the movement towards giving more time and effort to developing not just cognitive skills but also affective skills in the classroom. Indeed there is no conflict between them. How can you be a successful doctor, teacher, salesman or boss without both knowledge and social skills? The emotionally safe classroom is logically a classroom where more learning can take place. The social environment of a school highly determines the ability of students to concentrate on school work.
Indeed, whole child education will make schooling a whole lot better. |